A- de 2010
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla
✓Claimant Hilda Esperanza Caldas Vs Famisanar Eps.·Respondent Sin Información
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Reiteración de jurisprudencia sobre recobro de servicios médicos no cubiertos por el plan de beneficios ante el Fosyga o entidades territoriales
- Procedencia de oficio y a solicitud de parte respecto de conceptos o frases contenidas en la parte resolutiva o que influyan en ella
- Reiteración improcedencia de aclaración, corrección o adición
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de aclaración de la sentencia T-694/09.
La Sala encuentra que en este caso no es procedente la aclaración ya que el fallo no presenta falta de claridad.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. DENEGAR la solicitud de aclaracion de la sentencia T-694 de octubre 2 de 2009, proferida por la Sala Septima de Revision en agosto 19 del mismo ano.
- Segundo. INFORMAR al interesado que contra el presente auto no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.